On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 22:15:19 -0400 Neale Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not the tape error per se but the code in the kernel. X'0000' will give > you an operation exception and the kernel will throw up its hands and give > up. That's the expected behaviour since the code threw a BUG(), which is achieved by 0000 on s390 :) It means the tape driver did something strage which the block layer didn't like at all (and since this happened in interrupt context, it caused a kernel panic). > Is this the latest tape mod you have for this kernel? I'd second that question. The BUG() may have been caused by a problem in the 3590 driver (or the tape_block driver). Cornelia ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
