Hi, Rob. I didn't miss the posts, but I'm not sure what to do with that information to "prove" that we can run at the same performance level.
So essentially, are you saying that we can't get the same performance on a directory to directory copy without investing in 2 IFL engines? Thanks. Peggy Peggy Andrews Sr. Systems Engineer Information Technology Department Technical Support Services Division City of Sacramento (916) 808-5438 >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/18/2006 8:06:40 AM >>> On 5/18/06, Peggy Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Given recent events (the new "who's been reading our list"), I'm > hesitant on posting all information here, but I still have a problem > with this transfer performance on our z/VM Linux guests. I am pretty sure we answered you here and came to the conclusion both mini disk cache and CPU contention between the two virtual machines explained the behaviour. Did you miss those posts? Rob -- Rob van der Heij Velocity Software, Inc http://velocitysoftware.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
