You've put your finger on the crux of the matter there. We're not sure. We believe it was Teamquest that reported the error, but the first mention of this issue came from someone who's on vacation right now.
I would have been inclined to discount the message except for the hanging threads and IBM's report that this was caused by a memory shortage. > -----Original Message----- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Carsten Otte > Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 10:55 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Swap partition "filling up" on RHEL4 > > > Hall, Ken (GTI) wrote: > > Here's how it looks NOW. Can't speak for the time of the failure. > You stated, one swap device is full and another is not (at the time of > failure). Where do you get that data from? > > cheers, > Carsten > -- > Carsten Otte has stopped smoking: Ich habe in 3 Monate, 5 Tage und 22 > Stunden schon 470,07 Euro gespart anstatt 1.958,63 Zigaretten > zu kaufen. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO > LINUX-390 or visit > http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 > -------------------------------------------------------- If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/ -------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
