> I'm glad this works for you.  I can do that to, if I want to continue
> being the handful that can support the box.  I honestly recognize your
> points and see the validity in them, but anything short of what I'm
> asking for will continue to leave us 5 SA's as the only SA's for this
> platform.  My average Unix SA's around me expect to be able to use vi,
> and most of them have no clue what to do without it.  As for manually
> doing the ifconfig, fine and dandy, as long as they can get to the man
> page for it.  They're use to Solaris and HP, they aren't going to know
> the linux syntax and device names without a reference... which at home
> in the middle of the night on-call they won't have readily.

Possible alternatives: 

1) Write them a quick cookbook man page detailing the steps to get a
guest back on the net -- call it zlinux-console -- and put it on one of
the Solaris or HP boxes. They can log in to their favorite environment
and type 'man zlinux-console', and it's all laid out for them, and that
way it's always available wherever they happen to be.

2) Put all the platform specific info into a wiki or something. This is
good practice regardless of the platform (cf Time Management for
Sysadmins, by Tom Limoncelli)

3) deploy a 'netconfig' script on your zLinux instances that prompts for
the critical parameters (ip addres, netmask, default route) and executes
the appropriate stuff for them. 

All address the issue w/o substantial effort, and can be done in an
afternoon or less. 

> Without that, it won't get adopted by the rest of Unixdom, at least
not
> here.  Most of these admins have never seen a mainframe, let alone
have
> any idea how to deal with one.  It's not just that they want to be
> ignorant, there's also the cost of training them to do something
> differently.  They need to be able to do console work the way they
> always have, simple as that.

I guess I don't understand how they adapt to different kinds of systems,
then. It's no different than asking someone trained as a Solaris admin
to deal with a HP/UX box. At a fundamental level, it ain't the same
elephant, and they shouldn't expect it to be. *Every* platform has a few
weirdo things about it -- you cope and move on with fixing what needs
fixed. 

I don't see this as whining, but I do think we're trying to solve an
education problem with technology, which in the long run, just won't
work. 
 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to