On Friday, 10/20/2006 at 09:37 EST, Dave Hansen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would be careful using VIPA on the same subnet as the real interfaces.
 On a
> class 'C' subnet we had Vipa as 10.0.2.191 and the real interfaces
> as 10.0.2.192 and 10.02.193.  It didn't work.  Our contractor changed
the
> subnet mask on the VIPA address and it "worked".  However we were left
with
> overlapping IP addreses on the two subnets.

Overlapping networks are bad, whether you're using VIPA or not.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to