You're right! Should be LINK 100 SOMEGUYS 191 Never try to overthink these things, huh!
Marcy Cortes "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation." -----Original Message----- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Mansell Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:06 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] New DASD But then if I modelled it on the LINK statement, I'd wind up back to front again :-) Ray Mansell Marcy Cortes wrote: > If you think of it as device statements in the dir are usually > SOMETHING VADDR, then remembering that the virtual address is first > makes more sense. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
