> -----Original Message----- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Mike Lovins > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 1:35 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: New DASD > > > The main reason I asked the question was because my Z/VM > specialist does not want to keep track of virtual address. He > said that when a virtual drive 0750 has a problem it is > harder to trackdown which one is really having a problem. I > thank he doesn't need to worry about that because the device > will call IBM or Hatachi or whom ever and tell them which > device is having the problem....
Then he is too ****ed lazy, in my not so humble opinion. That's outrageous. Why even bother with z/VM in that case? How hard is it to look in the VM directory to relate a virtual address to a real address, "even a caveman can do it!" (Geico commercial). -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its content is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
