On Friday, 11/03/2006 at 09:35 CET, Mark Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it simply a matter that the code exists for Expanded storage, so you > continue to use it rather than write new code that could also benefit > from the ability to write from Central to DASD directly? Ah, I get it now. Yes, we continue to use Expanded storage because the code exists. We haven't gotten around to changing the implementation to eliminate it because we've been "otherwise engaged". BTW, we can operate minidisk cache out of Central storage. The design changes needed are known. When it becomes the most important fish, we'll fry it. :-) Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
