Hi Chris,

Yes, but.  We have support for Oracle on HP-UX.
There is some question whether we have, or can get, support for Oracle
9i on S/390 Linux, as we're not licensed for that product.  I'm not one
of the Oracle DBAs, so I'm not authorized to contact Oracle.  And so
far, the DBAs haven't figured it out.

I did try posting to Oracle's Database Installation forum, but the
response has been a deafening silence.  Other than one post that said
that yes, Java 1.3.1 can be a bit weird.


I'll keep asking to see if I can get someone to send an email or make a
phone call, and find out if we can get support on this product.

Thanks,
Dave

(How can you evaluate something, if you can't even get is installed?)



Dave Stuart
Prin. Info. Systems Support Analyst
County of Ventura, CA
805-662-6731
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/7/2006 1:16 PM >>>
I understand your frustration.

Let me ask... Do you have Oracle support?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of David Stuart
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 1:56 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: SLES 9 SP 3 - Oracle 9i install problem
>
> Adam,
>
> It appears that the segmentation fault is occurring on a exec call.
> The last line of the sh -x ./java display shows:
>
> + exec
> /work/Disk1/stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.3.1.0.0/1/DataFi
> les/Expanded/lnx390/IBMJava2-s390-131/jre/bin/exe/java
> Segmentation fault
>
> And that's it.  Back to the user prompt.  Any ideas?
>
> I have the complete output from the sh -x ./java, if you want
> to see it.
>
> This is really getting frustrating.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
> Dave Stuart
> Prin. Info. Systems Support Analyst
> County of Ventura, CA
> 805-662-6731
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/6/2006 5:34 PM >>>
> On Dec 6, 2006, at 5:18 PM, David Boyes wrote:
>
> >> File shows ./java to be a Bourne Shell script.
> >> This is IBMJava2-s390-131, that came as part of the Oracle 9i
> >> distribution.
> >
> > That seems wrong. *Is* it a script? If so, what is it actually
> > executing (vi it and have a peek at what binary it's
> actually running,
> > and
> test
> > that with 'file')? If it's *not* a script, then I'd still
> bet you have
> > a rogue Intel binary somewhere -- renaming it and trying
> with the java
> > executable you have in your path would be the next step.
>
> "java" usually *IS* a shell script, because it does all sorts
> of environment management before it starts the actual
> interpreter.  Do a sh -x ./java and see where it's *really*
> segfaulting.
>
> Adam
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access
> instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
> message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access
> instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
> message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390
or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to