Christian, I question the usefulness of having this mailing list in the MAINTAINERS file at all. Perhaps we could create another list that people could subscribe to that really are interested in this level of discussion. I know I was thinking about re-purposing linux390-dev anyway.
Mark Post -----Original Message----- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Borntraeger Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 4:10 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [PATCH 50/59] sysctl: Move utsname sysctls to their own file On Wednesday 17 January 2007 22:01, David Boyes wrote: > Could you guys take this discussion back to LKML, please? I don't > think it's directly relevant to Linux on S/390 any longer, and few (if > any) people there really want this level of detail. After following this list for some years, I agree that the [email protected] list seems not appropriate for kernel patches. What do people think about this patch in the MAINTAINERS file? --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -2799,7 +2799,7 @@ M: [EMAIL PROTECTED] P: Heiko Carstens M: [EMAIL PROTECTED] M: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -L: [email protected] +L: [email protected] (user-oriented, no kernel development) W: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/linux390/ S: Supported -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Christian Borntraeger Linux Software Engineer zSeries Linux & Virtualization ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
