Any graphical editor you use on Linux/390 is going to be pretty slow. Emacs isn't any different, really, than vi. They're both (n)curses based, with an alternate, X-enabled version. You can use gvim (used to be xvim I think) instead of just vi(m), but again, due to the graphics, it's going to suck CPU and be at least a little slow.
How much editing are you doing that you can't just use vi (or emacs)? Once I get a system up and running, I hardly ever edit anything. You can get into trouble with editing files on your workstation and using FTP to upload them (aside from the inherent insecurity of non-SSL-enabled FTP). Just be careful of your line endings. Make sure you don't have any CRLFs in your files once you upload them. If you miss some, scripts (and other things) start spitting out _strange_ errors that usually take a while to figure out are related to line endings. Mark Post -----Original Message----- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Warren Taylor Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 6:58 PM To: [email protected] Subject: full screen editor and SSH Hello gurus, what is a good (full screen) editior to use when you are dialing in remotely. I use SSH to dial into my linux on a VM guest and I am really hooked on using a full screen editor and can't deal with ed or vi. I tried using something like gedit when I dial in from another linux image (using the graphics ability of this remote linux) but it is slow and appears to be pretty buggy. The best thing I've found so far is to ftp a file down to the pc and then edit it with wordpad and then ftp it back. I've seen emacs - is this my only alternative? and are there any dangers in using wordpad and ftp? thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
