On 2/21/07, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

z/OS could do the same thing, letting sftp and scp use the same
translation settings.  Of course, the ssh protocol is extendable and could
include channel types specifically designed for file transfer, as opposed
to command/response.

I have not even heard the "which ASCII" and "which EBCDIC" yet ;-)
Considering that any change will impact installed base of programs and
human minds, we probably need to add two additional paths for those
who know what they want. With VM NFS, I simply mounted the directory
twice (once with and once without translation) because I could not
make the network folks to listen. And it was up to the user and/or
application to take the correct path (no 00D intended).

If sshd has an option to enable / disable translation, you could run
one of each on different IP stacks, and allow users / applications use
different host names to select translation or not. Just using a
different port might be even better because that does not complicate
the key issues.

There's also options to specify the cipher to be used (even via the
known_hosts IIIRC) but I am not sure we could come up with a cipher
that also does the translation along with encrypt and decrypt. And the
idea is probably so ugly that I would want to keep it secret if we
could :-)

Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to