>>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 1:47 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, LJ Mace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark > Firt let me that you for the quick response. I tried > your suggestion and still got garbage. A few line > display is: > LZà @ÃäÃÃÃÃ@ `aaÃ|óÃaaà ¢ > £ aaà n L n L > à [EMAIL PROTECTED] £ @ £ £ ÃãÃÃã Å¡@ @Ã| > Å [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] @Å Å Å KŠón L£ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] @à @ä £ @ä£ £š@ La£ Ân L £ > @ > ££ `⬠¥~ ã £`ãš@ £ £~ > > Yes what your looking at is what I get.
So, what does it look like with the "less" command? The same? If so, the problem isn't w3m. Mark Post
