Tom,
ultimately complaints on how informative SPident is should go to SUSE
(Mark Post?) :-)
Looking at your output it is informing you that Xfree86-Mesa (64 and
32bit) is backlevel. But interestingly on SP1 and SP2, not SP3.
If your installation was followed to the letter of the SUSE docs, then
this is a question for SUSE.
Mark
Tom Duerbusch wrote:
Thanks...that was interesting, but seemly useless <G>. Have no idea what it is
trying to tell me. As this was a fresh install of SLES9 with SP3 with the default
package selection, I would expect no conflicts.
So I expect:
CONCLUSION: System is NOT up-to-date!
found SLES-9-s390x
expected SLES-9-s390x-SP3
isn't a problem either?
Just for kicks, here is the results:
linux40:~ # SPident -v -v -v
Summary (using 549 packages)
Product/ServicePack conflict match update (shipped)
SLES-9-s390x 0 0% 278 50.6% 0 (1555 17.9%)
SLES-9-s390x-SP1 2 0.4% 63 11.5% 0 (529 11.9%)
- XFree86-Mesa 4.3.99.902-43.22 < 4.3.99.902-43.37
- XFree86-Mesa-32bit 9-200407011411 < 9-200501052045
SLES-9-s390x-SP2 2 0.3% 127 23.1% 0 (684 18.6%)
- XFree86-Mesa 4.3.99.902-43.22 < 4.3.99.902-43.48
- XFree86-Mesa-32bit 9-200407011411 < 9-200506070135
SLES-9-s390x-SP3 0 0% 271 49.4% 0 (793 34.2%)
Legend for Package Details:
- conflicting package (found < expected)
+ updated package (found > expected)
CONCLUSION: System is NOT up-to-date!
found SLES-9-s390x
expected SLES-9-s390x-SP3
linux40:~ #
Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
