On 5/3/07, James Tison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Of course you can!! CVS is easy.
Building svn from source is a much different story -- critical dependencies
on Apache, ART, yadeyadeyada -- not all systems are properly equipped. Been
there, done that -- it's a pain.
But if it were me putting up a "better CVS", I'd think twice and reconsider
Subversion, especially if available in binary/RPM form -- tagging is
unnecessary, and branching is almost second nature. Quite a different story
than CVS.
--Jim--
"Spann, Elizebeth
(Betsie)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To
Sent by: Linux on [email protected]
390 Port cc
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU> Subject
Re: RHEL source control packages
05/03/2007 12:06
PM
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU>
CVS is not on my RHEL distribution (I can't find it) and the
www.cvshome.org website has no s390x binaries. Not sure if I can make it
from the source that's listed on the site.
Betsie
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
Hello!
Jim, can you cite specifics here? I've had nearly no problems building
subversion for my Slackware Intel platforms, before it was finally
released as part of the basic developer tools kit. About the only
really loud problem was that of the time involved, but most of us are
familiar with that one.
Mark can you offer any comments here?
--
Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"This signature was once found posting rude
messages in English in the Moscow subway."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
