> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of Mark Post
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 9:49 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: OK - a really stupid question.
> 

<snip>

> 
> It's not me that wants them, it's the customers and IBM 
> employees that do.  I've never even installed DB2 on Linux.  
> All I know is that a recent IBM meeting, someone who works 
> with both versions talked about their being real differences 
> between them.
> 
> 
> Mark Post
> 

As I understand it, and I could easily be wrong, the product called DB2
actually has three code bases. There are separate code bases for z/OS,
Windows/UNIX/Linux (UDB), and i5/OS (AS/400). That is why the three
"versions" have different capability. Again, as I understand it, the IBM
DB2 developers are trying to come to a converged code base, but there
are historical differences which are incompatable.

Supposedly, Oracle has a "plus" in that the current version of Oracle
for all platforms is generated from the same code base. The only
differences are in the system interface code sections needed to support
the specific OS.

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology

The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged
and/or confidential.  It is for intended addressee(s) only.  If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is
strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal
offense.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing
it. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to