Fuzzy Logic wrote:
I disagree with you John. It was quite clear that Betsie was replying to Dave Jones' statement that "No, it's the usual suspects at Tivoli being their usual idiotic selves..."
You're quite entitled you your opinion, but the fact remains that it did take me a while to work out what Betsie was talking about.
I hope we're not going to get into the whole top-posting vs bottom-posting vs inter-posting debate on here as well.
_Those_ terms speak of a religious debate, and for that reason I try to avoid them. Besides, "bottom posting" as it's usually defined is not really the opposite of "top posting." It's more between two extremes, the middle course. I didn't have a clear position on the matter until I sought information and a quote for a computer system. Had the salesperson followed my suggestion and followed _this_ procedure, he'd have addressed all my points and probably got the sale. He didn't, he missed some important points and I bought elsewhere. And at that time I understood the reason for interleaving one's reply and took my side. Previously, I'd been doing it anyway, but only because it suited me to do that.
Fuzzy
-- Cheers John -- spambait [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please do not reply off-list ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
