Hi Eric,

short answer: if "multipath -ll" doesn't show anything, your setup still 
isn't correct. Now for some more information.
Is the output of "multipath -v3" that you sent complete? It sound a bit 
strange. If DASDs aren't blacklisted there
should be some action. The "not found in pathvec" is normal for an 
inittial run. It just says there hasn't been any
information about the paths gathered, yet.
You might increase the verbosity level to 6 and send it (proably to me 
directly, since it gets quite large). So we might see why
the multipath volumes aren't created.

Mit freundlichem Gruß / Regards,
Stefan Bader

SW Linux on zSeries Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter
Geschäftsführung: Herbert Kircher
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  When all other means of communication fail, try words.

Linux on 390 Port <[email protected]> wrote on 14.06.2007 17:49:17:

> This is not the exact issue I am seeing...
> 
> Here are my results and this is the case before and after the change to
> multipath.conf per the bugz workaround.
> 
> # multipath
> #
> # multipath -v3
> load path identifiers cache
> #
> # all paths in cache :
> #
> path dasda not found in pathvec
> 
> ===== path info dasda (mask 0x1f) =====
> path dasdb not found in pathvec
> 
> ===== path info dasdb (mask 0x1f) =====
> path dasdc not found in pathvec
> 
> ===== path info dasdc (mask 0x1f) =====
> path dasdd not found in pathvec
> 
> ===== path info dasdd (mask 0x1f) =====
> md0 blacklisted
> ram0 blacklisted
> ram10 blacklisted
> ram11 blacklisted
> ram12 blacklisted
> ram13 blacklisted
> ram14 blacklisted
> ram15 blacklisted
> ram1 blacklisted
> ram2 blacklisted
> ram3 blacklisted
> ram4 blacklisted
> ram5 blacklisted
> ram6 blacklisted
> ram7 blacklisted
> ram8 blacklisted
> ram9 blacklisted
> 
> Interesting enough though iostat has the exact same stats for both
> /dev/dasdb and /dev/dasdd and when running pvscan I receive the 
following:
> dasdb        0.00   0.00  0.00  0.00    0.00    0.00     0.00
> 0.00    22.67     0.00   23.33  13.33   0.00
> dasdd        0.00   0.00  0.00  0.00    0.00    0.00     0.00
> 0.00    22.67     0.00   21.67  13.33   0.00
> 
>  pvscan
>   Found duplicate PV sAHQBBquhyI5mbrj8QdvW3zM4YKXjEod: using /dev/dasdd1
> not /dev/dasdb1
>   PV /dev/dasdd1         lvm2 [2.29 GB]
>   Total: 1 [2.29 GB] / in use: 0 [0   ] / in no VG: 1 [2.29 GB]
> 
> So my question is, is PAV working or not?  If it is how can I be certain
> it is?  multipath -ll returns no data that would lead me to believe
> multipathing is working.
> 
> Thoughts / assistance?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> Bradford Hinson wrote:
> > This looks related to:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238983
> >
> > (see error msg at end of comment 0)
> >
> > On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 08:56 -0400, Eric Sammons wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am trying to configure PAV on RHEL 4 and am running into a problem. 
 I
> >> have been working from the "How to Improve Performance with PAV 
November
> >> 17, 2006" document.
> >>
> >> So it appears PAV is configured.
> >>
> >> i.e.
> >>
> >> DASD 0100 ON DASD  304F R/W 0X0100 SUBCHANNEL = 0000
> >> *DASD 0101 ON DASD  314F R/W 0X0101 SUBCHANNEL = 0001*
> >> DASD 0190 3390 520RES R/O        107 CYL ON DASD  300B SUBCHANNEL = 
0008
> >> DASD 0191 3390 VM350B R/O        470 CYL ON DASD  350B SUBCHANNEL = 
000C
> >> DASD 019D 3390 V01W01 R/O        146 CYL ON DASD  330B SUBCHANNEL = 
0009
> >> DASD 019E 3390 V01W01 R/O        250 CYL ON DASD  330B SUBCHANNEL = 
000A
> >> DASD 0200 9336 (VDSK) R/W     524288 BLK ON DASD  VDSK SUBCHANNEL = 
0016
> >> *DASD 0201 ON DASD  31B0 R/W 0X0101 SUBCHANNEL = 0002*
> >> DASD 0592 3390 V01W01 R/O         67 CYL ON DASD  330B SUBCHANNEL = 
000B
> >>
> >>
> >> # vmcp q pav 314f
> >> Device 314F is a base Parallel Access Volume with the following 
aliases:
> >> 31B0
> >>
> >> However, after loading the kernel module:
> >> dm_multipath           43792  0
> >>
> >> and starting multipathd, oh and modifying the /etc/multipath.conf to
> >> comment out the blacklist (and yes I modified the file before 
starting
> >> multipathd) I still get no results when I run mulipath.
> >>
> >>
> >> # multipath
> >> #
> >>
> >> When I run multipath -v3 -d I get the following:
> >>
> >> load path identifiers cache
> >> ux_socket_connect error
> >> #
> >> # all paths in cache :
> >> #
> >> path dasda not found in pathvec
> >>
> >> ===== path info dasda (mask 0x1f) =====
> >> path dasdb not found in pathvec
> >>
> >> ===== path info dasdb (mask 0x1f) =====
> >> path dasdc not found in pathvec
> >>
> >> ===== path info dasdc (mask 0x1f) =====
> >> path dasdd not found in pathvec
> >>
> >> ===== path info dasdd (mask 0x1f) =====
> >> md0 blacklisted
> >> ram0 blacklisted
> >> ram10 blacklisted
> >> ram11 blacklisted
> >> ram12 blacklisted
> >> ram13 blacklisted
> >> ram14 blacklisted
> >> ram15 blacklisted
> >> ram1 blacklisted
> >> ram2 blacklisted
> >> ram3 blacklisted
> >> ram4 blacklisted
> >> ram5 blacklisted
> >> ram6 blacklisted
> >> ram7 blacklisted
> >> ram8 blacklisted
> >> ram9 blacklisted
> >>
> >>
> >> I am concerned about the ux_socket_connect error and the not found in
> >> pathvec errors.  Anyone know what might be going on here?  Am I 
missing
> >> something here?
> >>
> >> thanks!
> >> Eric
> >>
> >> 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >> send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO 
> LINUX-390 or visit
> >> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
> >>
> > --
> > Brad Hinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Technical Account Manager
> > Red Hat, Inc.
> > (888) 733-4281 x44198
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO 
> LINUX-390 or visit
> > http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
> >
> >
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or 
visit
> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to