For the SSL enabler, I can live with an increased footprint if it can help you
create, maintain and package it.
Thanks for doing this for the VM community.
/Tom Kern
/A very satisfied customer of free software.
--- Adam Thornton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's "A"; however doing "B" with stunnel is also pretty easy and
> straightforward. Buy me some beer and I'll show you how after work
> some day (that's a general offer to list members, too, btw, although
> I don't think many of you are also resident in St. Louis).
>
> When we move the SSL enabler to the 5.3 codebase, we may go with
> CentOS rather than Debian as the underlying distro. This would make
> it a much easier packaging job from our perspective, but it will
> increase the size of the download substantially (from 250 cylinders
> to....well, I don't know how minimal I can get CentOS, but probably
> closer to 1000). Is this going to pose a real problem for anyone?
>
> Adam
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
