>>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 11:45 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Brandt, Mark H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IMHO it would be more efficient to get IBM and Novel to address the > issue and eliminate VDISK memory creep without having to configure > multiple VDISKS with different priorities. > > If memory constraints can be addressed in z/VM 5.3 with z9's (CMM) why > can't the above issue be resolved ?
Because it would involve a change in the way Linux works on all platforms, not just System z, and would likely be shot down by every other architecture out there. Since defining a second VDISK doesn't cost very much in the way of system resources, I would rather the developers spend their time on other areas. Mark Post ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
