I found it somewhat interesting. NASM is more like HLASM than GAS, so I guess it would be easier for somebody like me (HLASM programmer) to use NASM. Neither is anywhere near as powerful, of course.
<quote> This article explains some of the more important syntactic and semantic differences between two of the most popular assemblers for Linux(r), GNU Assembler (GAS) and Netwide Assembler (NASM), including differences in basic syntax, variables and memory access, macro handling, functions and external routines, stack handling, and techniques for easily repeating blocks of code. </quote> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-gas-nasm.html?ca=dgr-l nxw03LinuxGASNASM&S_TACT=105AGX59&S_CMP=GR -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
