>>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at  8:18 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ivan Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> Mark Post wrote:
>> Yes, they're now trying to push Ubuntu in the server market.  I have
no idea 
> just how minuscule their "market share" is in that regard, but I
imagine it's 
> pretty small.  Most people who really want a F/LOSS server have gone
with 
> Debian.  Those who are more pragmatic use SLES or RHEL.  Until
someone in the 
> Ubuntu community feels strongly enough to put the time and effort in
(and I 
> know all too well, that is a *lot* of time and effort), there won't
be a 
> version for the mainframe.
>>
>> If there *is* someone out there, reading this, that feels that
strongly, 
> there are a couple of options open to you for doing the build on real

> mainframe hardware.  It doesn't have to be all cross-compiles, or
Hercules.
>>
>>   
> My understanding here is that there are more than just what you are 
> stating (if you allow me to be as daring to come forth with such a
bold 
> statement :P)..

I think "minuscule" in terms of server deployments in general is
correct, but if you have pointers to references, I'm more than happy to
take a look so I can be correct in the future.

> First debian is utterly lacking a full s390x (read z/Arch) userland..

> Well.. They have the necessary tools to build s390x binaries, but no

> such thing as a full s390x distro.. I believe that simply comes from
a 
> lack of interest and manpower to do that..

I wouldn't say "lack of interest."   The manpower is more of an issue. 
I know "they" just as I with Slack/390, have been working on a 64-bit
version for some time.  One thing people need to keep in mind is that if
you don't really need a 64-bit, the 31-bit versions run just fine on
System z hardware.

> Second (and this addresses all distros != SLES|RHEL) is the lack of
ISV 
> support for those (and this is not a s390/s390x thing.. it's cross 
> platform)...

Absolutely.  It's really too costly for an ISV to certify their
software on something that isn't going to be running on a _lot_ of
systems, and keep it reasonably affordable.  It's one of the things that
I wish were different, but it is reality.

> Of course, this is not really a 'linux' issue per-se (more 
> a glibc & consort problem). But basically what is putting off a lot
of 
> people from going for, say, a full debian system is that it's close
to 
> impossible to run some of the midleware that most applications now
need.

I haven't heard that before.  Do you mean the software doesn't work, or
it is just not certified and supported by the ISV?

> The ubuntu folks (read Canonical) do provide (if you read the PR) 
> professional grade support (never tried it though).. The only big
diff 
> here is that ubuntu is supposedly providing the exact and same distro

> out in the wild to the general public than the per-for-support one
(in 
> contrast to novell/redhat which have 2 different deliverables) .. 

>Of 
> course, "public" distros make little sense for s390x (considering the

> number of people that have a z9 in their living room) so since ubuntu

> seems to be heavily relying on public support for its internal
support, 
> then it's not just a matter of compiling/porting the thing.

As the maintainer/developer of Slack/390, I would of course disagree to
some extent.  I may not have a _lot_ of users, but I do have some, and a
number of those are using it for production.

> Now.. compiling an entire GNU/Linux system on hercules.. boy ! you 
> really need to have time on your hand (or a truckload of CPU 
> horsepower). Because otherwise, we're talking weeks !

Umm, it takes more than "weeks" on real mainframe hardware.  And, as I
said, for anyone that is really serious about doing the work needed to
put out another distribution, Hercules is not the only choice available.
 If it were, I would probably still be working on compiling Slackware
8.something.

> Anyway.. that was just my €.02 (I doubt my Euro sign will get
through.. 
> So that "?" is actually a euro sign for those wondering)

Actually, it did, at least for me.


Mark Post

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to