Erik N Johnson wrote:
The man page I have claims to be part of 4th Berkeley Distribution
Manual Section 8.
However the authors both have redhat e-mail addresses.
Its inclusion in section 8 does more or less qualify it as 'system'
software, which in modern systems one CERTAINLY expects to store
sparse files efficiently. So I agree, this probably ought to be
brought to the attention of the package maintainers. Anybody know who
that would be?
If you got it from redhat, bugzilla.redhat.com
If you got it from SUSE, report it there.
Likewise Debian, Slack.
If I rote some software and RH/SUSE/Debian etc distributed it to
gazillions of people, I would not want those gazillions of people
complaining to me that it doesn't work. That's what the distro-makers
should be handling.
fwiw if you want support for PHP4 now, that's exactly what you must do.
rhe folk at php.net have gone on to other things and effectively
orphaned php4. As all software writers must do.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[email protected] [email protected]
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
