David Boyes wrote:
Background:
Upgrading a system to current level. Have a vendor product that insists on
the installation of a backlevel component application that causes the
configuration and service management system to report errors in the
configuration. Vendor insists that the backlevel component is the only way,
but the errors cause problems with future upgrades and overall configuration
management by reporting false positives when checked for whether the system
is up to date and has all service applied.
Question:
I believe the maker of the vendor product is in error here. Am I wrong?
a. The vendor wants your money?
b. The vendor stands in the way of your fixing other, potentially
serious, problems?
I would be reluctant to deal with such.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[email protected] [email protected]
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
