>>> Porting the package properly would work better.
>> I'm not sure I follow.  Could you explain?
> A package that monitors the ECKD hardware and produces alerts, in a
> similar manner to what the smartmon tools do, would work better. I doubt
> that the ECKD data could be translated to SMART data without loss of
> information.

On the other hand, if you invent something new, you lose all the benefits of
the other goodies that build on top of smartmon.

The package has support for at least 3 major families of disk monitoring
commands already, so teaching it one more new one would be a much less
complex undertaking. It already understands ATA, SATA, and SCSI. CCW isn't
all that conceptually different from SCSI (don't say it -- the ideas are
similar, I know the commands and command structures are different). There
are also a fair number of SMART command responses that pass a "blob" of
device-specific data back, so you could probably stick the more complex ERP
data in those payloads.

But, someday when I have free time.

-- db 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to