Interesting -- then it isn't getting recreated from /etc/shadow or
something...

Maybe there is some option that keeps maintenance from doing this -- but
failing that, I'd consider this behavior a security issue.  If the
maintenance wants to complain (as it would on zVM for example if FTPSERVE
was missing) that it can't apply the maintenance or something is missing --
that's fine.   But actually creating accounts isn't...   That would
invalidate many security scans I know about at various customers...

So - not much help from me, other than if 'games' is a required system
account - I guess the joke's on us ;-)   Maybe someone else has insight on
ways to keep this from happening...

Scott

On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Marcy Cortes
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Thanks Scott.  I started to answer that question earlier but apparently
> didn't hit send.
>
> Userdel is what I used to remove them from the golden image.
>
> I suspect is was maintenance.  Recently SP3 went on a bunch of servers.
>
>
> Marcy
>
> "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
> you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee,
> you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message
> or any information herein. If you have received this message in error,
> please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this
> message. Thank you for your cooperation."
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Scott Rohling
> Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 7:31 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Where does "games" come from?
>
> Hi Marcy -- back to reality here...   how did you remove the accounts?
> Did any actions precipate them returning?
>
> Scott
>
> p.s.  And Jack -- all due respect... other than: "that's what you get for
> changing anything" -- I didn't get where any of your posts were going.
> These mailing lists are about encouraging understanding - not discouraging
> it.
>
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Marcy Cortes
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > That came out wrong.
> > "the policy is still broken"
> >
> > I meant, we've gone against the policy.
> >
> > It's harder to win the policy battle that to just do it and move on.
> > Believe me, I have enough other things to do.
> >
> > Marcy
> >
> > "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
> > you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
> addressee,
> > you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this
> message
> > or any information herein. If you have received this message in error,
> > please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this
> > message. Thank you for your cooperation."
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
> > visit
> > http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
> visit
> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
> visit
> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to