> -----Original Message----- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Mark Post > Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 1:10 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: /usr/local -or- /local > > >>> On 1/5/2010 at 1:55 PM, Richard Troth > <[email protected]> wrote: > -snip- > > Novell? RedHat? What do y'all say? Is there a problem with this? > > No clue. Why do you need a /local in the first place? > > > Mark Post >
I think what he wants to do is mount a filesystem at /local, then be able to refer to it via the symlink /usr/local . Instead of mounting a filesystem at /usr/local. I don't know how, but he said that mounting the filesystem at /usr/local could result in "one FS hiding the other". I don't understand that. -- John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative Services Group HealthMarkets(r) 9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 (817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell [email protected] * www.HealthMarkets.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
