On Wed Jan 27  9:10 , Mark Post <[email protected]> sent:

>>>> On 1/27/2010 at 11:05 AM, Tom Anderson [email protected]> wrote: 
>>> Wow.  That's way too many :)
>>>Course 64K should be enough for anybody.
>> 
>> Remember saying that exact phrase about memory? ;)
>
>Off by an order of magnitude.  640K, not 64K.
When we first got "toy" computers, we used to build all our applications to link
as ".com" binaries:  single "base" register, no relocation information, and a
flat 64K virtual address space.  Fast, efficient, reliable, and easy to debug. 
;)

Anyway, you all get the point:  software tends to expand to fill the available
resources (not saying this is good or bad, just, generally, true).

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to