Thanks for the comments.
> to set DB2 memory management to "automatic" to let it size itself based
on the Linux configuration.
Which can be interpreted as, with STMM set (fully) on, DB2 will try to use
85% of configured memory (if it needs it ofr not). Then it's back to
guessing how much is really needed. After the initial wag of sizing,
(hopefully it is on the conservative side), it finding the point where
there is enough memory to run at the peak loads and have a little to spare
and not too much to cause excessive VM paging.
I am a little surprised that we are not mentioning response times for DB
requests during peak periods, or throughput as metrics to help evaluate
memory needs and the tools/ways to help collect this data.
Thx



Rob van der Heij <[email protected]>
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port <[email protected]>
02/05/2010 10:03 AM
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port <[email protected]>


To
[email protected]
cc

Subject
Re: A Question on Sizing z/VM Linux Guests






On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Sterling James <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I realize that it would not be a apples to apples comparison, but is
there
> a similar discussion about sizing guests that are running DB2? With STMM
> on? And the "Be ware!"s? Does DB2 have instrumentation that can tell you
> how it's using memory and indicate "good" value. I am aware the STMM is
> suppose to do that automatically, but I am suspicious of it's assumption
> since it does know account for running under zVM.

The DB2 folks will prefer to compare oranges and oranges, since IBM is
very strict on not involving competitors in comparisons. :-)

You're right, with DB2 there's also shared memory between threads that
lives in page cache. So you should expect the page cache to be fairly
large on such a system. I did find that many DBA's seem to set DB2
memory management to "automatic" to let it size itself based on the
Linux configuration. I don't think DB2 needs to be aware that Linux
runs on z/VM. If the automatic memory management works well, it would
not be a bad approach that you'd only have to size the virtual machine
to make it happen.

We recently had conversations with the DB2 people discussing changes
in DB2 to improve behavior for low-utilized servers with Linux on
z/VM. I'm supposed to get my hands on the fix pack that implements
those RSN and be able to kick the tires. I'm also interested to
investigate the tuning options and instrumentation.

Rob
--
Rob van der Heij
Velocity Software
http://www.velocitysoftware.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390



-----------------------------------------
Please consider the environment before printing this email and any
attachments.

This e-mail and any attachments are intended only for the
individual or company to which it is addressed and may contain
information which is privileged, confidential and prohibited from
disclosure or unauthorized use under applicable law.  If you are
not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified
that any use, dissemination, or copying of this e-mail or the
information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited by the
sender.  If you have received this transmission in error, please
return the material received to the sender and delete all copies
from your system.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to