Second time I am sending this.  Weird interaction with Droid GMail applet
since Samir's post appeared (to GMail) to be spam (but Mark's did not, duh).


Anyway, LDL is kind of a misnomer. It simply means that the disk is all
blocked consistently at 4K, which is more good than bad.  The only downside
to LDL is that z/OS does not grok it.  No great loss.  (No reason z/OS could
not grow up and get a driver or do SSCH to an LDL disk. Sheesh!)

Last I recall, yes, you could still boot from LDL just fine.  It is the
original layout for Linux/390 CKD.  It has been bootable all along.

Last time I measured DIAG -vs- SSCH, I was disappointed to not find
significant performance boost with the DIAG driver. That's surprising
because in theory we would get a major win when using the DIAG driver. (It
is the only mode used by CMS, which gave up CCW disk I/O decades ago.) But
there was no penalty, so I recommend DIAG even if throughput comparison is a
wash.

-- R;   <><
Rick Troth
Velocity Software
http://www.velocitysoftware.com/





On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:59, Samir Reddahi <[email protected]>wrote:

> We have currently a couple of DB2 machines with logical volumes on MOD-9
> ECKD disks. On our DB2 production server we have mdcache enabled for the
> logical volumes that contains the DB2 data. The other servers have mdcache
> disabled.
>
> We already use the DIAG driver for the swap disks and the VDISKs. Now I'm
> looking if it is interesting to switch the other disks to DIAG too.
>
> Disks are currently formatted with cdl. I've read that cdl and DIAG can't
> work together so the disks have to be formatted to another format. We will
> be migrating to a new Z196 and a new DS8800, so I can use the downtime to
> switch the logical volume to an LV with DIAG disks
>
> a couple of questions:
>
> 1) Are there any disadvantages of formatting disks as ldl instead of cdl?
> 2) Is it true that /boot directory has to be located on a non-DIAG disk?
> 3) What kind of performance improvement can I expect from a move to DIAG
> dasd
> 4) Any disadvantages of using DIAG instead of ECKD?
>
>
>
> Best regards
> *Samir Reddahi*
>
> System Engineer | Systeem MF, AS400, DBA Operations
> T +32 9 235 61 09 | M +32 478 80 68 30*
> **[email protected]* <[email protected]>
>
> [image: Securex Logo]*www.securex.be* <http://www.securex.be/>
> [image: Footer]
>
>
>
> - Confidentiality Notice -
>
>
> This communication and the information it contains is intended (a) for the 
> person(s) or organization(s)
>
> named above and for no other person or organization, and (b) may be 
> confidential, legally privileged and
>
> protected by law. Unauthorized use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be 
> unlawful! If you receive
>
> this communication in error, please notify us immediately, destroy any copies 
> and delete it from your
> computer system. Please consult our disclaimer on our site www.securex.eu
> Thank you.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/

Reply via email to