At first, when Mark suggested only -9 and -27 disks, I disagreed with him.
After a day, I started agreeing with him.
Now I'm back to disagreeing with him.  <G>
I guess it all depends....

First, you have to go back to hardware.  You can only create 256 drives out of 
any RAID array.  On the DS6800/DS8100, if you are using 72 GB drives, if you 
only define mod-3s, you can't use all the space available.  And this gets worse 
as you go to the 145 GB drives, the 300 GB drives, the 500 GB drives and the 1 
TB drives.  You just have to have some/many large 3390s in order to use all the 
space.

Mark is pretty much correct, that 3 3390-3 vs 1 3390-9 are the same.  If they 
are on the same raid array there isn't much performance improvement unless you 
consider that you can only do 1 I/O per device at the same time, unless you use 
PAV (and paid for that feature).

Consider that a mod-27 will be only on a single RAID array.  Divide it into 3 
3390-9 and you can put each one on a different array.  Now you can truely do 
multiple I/Os at the same time.  

In my case, I do have some larger Linux guests, but I do have a bunch of small 
ones.  Really they could be on a 3390-1, but, eventually, some of them, due to 
software installs, tend to grow and I need more space.  Their data, however, I 
either have as LVM (yep, larger capacity drives work well here), or NFS mounted 
space.  So my root drive is usually a 3390-3.  HOME and other data directories 
are on LVM or NFS space.

For example, my Oracle servers use LVM for local Oracle tablespace.  However, 
it backs up to a NFS server.  That NFS server is an easy place for me to backup 
all the data from multiple machines to tape.  The Oracle server is physically 
backed up weekly with FlashCopy and that flashed image is then backed up to 
tape as a physical image.  This is used for disaster recovery purposes.

My point is that small drives have their purpose.  But I also would tie 
together a dozen mod-3 drives if I had the option to tie together a lessor 
amount of mod-9 drives (or higher capacity).  

If you need I/O performance, make sure you spread your data across several 
arrays.  This may require you to do smaller drives.

I can sure tell the difference when I copy a GB file when from/to are on the 
same array vs from/to being on different arrays.

BTW, I'm not sure why someone would do this, but you can create mod-10, mod-11 
mod-xx drives in the IBM Dasd Subsystems.  Any size is really available.  But 
you may face issues of "standards".

Just another opinion

Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting

>>> Ron Foster at Baldor-IS <rfos...@baldor.com> 1/13/2011 1:41 PM >>>
Hello list,

This may have been discussed before...

Way back in deep dark ancient history, we used the Redbook to get
started with Linux under z/VM.  As a result, we carved up our storage
subsystem in to a bunch of mod3 drives.  We put a few mod 9 drives in
the mix.

We added drives to a guest in standard chunks.  That is when storage was
needed by a Linux system, we added a mod9 or mod3 to it.

When that Shark went off lease and we moved to a DS8000, we pretty well
kept the same philosophy.  Only we added a bunch more mod3 and mod 9 drives.

We are a SAP shop and any large databases reside in DB2 on z/OS.  There
are a few large file systems on 3 or 4 of our Linux systems, but for the
most part the drives attached to a Linux system go something like this.
A boot drive.  One to several mod3 drives for swapping (the appropriate
ones have vdisks).  One to several mod3 or mod9 drives for the SAP code
and local files.

We are moving our production drives.  We finally have gotten our
production Linux systems where about half or do very little swapping.

We do not have dirmaint, so we keep up with disk allocations with
dirmaint and a spreadsheet.

Now time has come to migrate to another storage system.  I was wondering
what other folks do.

1. Do they have a whole bunch of mod9 and mod3 drives that they allocate
to their guests?

2. Do they take mod27 drives (someone at SHARE warned me about taking
mod54 drives) and use mdisk to carve them up into something smaller.

Any input would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Ron Foster

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/

Reply via email to