On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, Michael MacIsaac wrote:
> function enableDevice { chccwdev -e $1; udevadm settle; }
>
> and always call that function instead chccwdev -e. So my question is
> still: "If a udevadm settle is always required after a chccwdev -e, then
> why is it not just built into the command?"
Since a) it depends on the type of the device and b) we would have a
dependancy on udevadm.
Regards,
Sebastian
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
