> Hmm. I wonder if it would be generally useful if vmur were extended to > allow specifying a pre, post, in-flight processing program/script. That way, > people wouldn't need to write replacements for vmur itself for stuff like > this.
Or just a pair of tools (ND[encode, decode]) that could be inserted in a pipe string from vmur. I might have a C or Perl version of something like that left over from the NJE Bridge development. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
