I'm going back and putting / in a partition of it's own.
And will then try to add the other 3 disks to a btrfs.

So during install I don't see a way to add 3 disks to btrfs without first
creating an LVM volume group.  I see no way to run this command, btrfs
device add dev1 dev2 /path/to/filesystem during install.

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Mark Post <[email protected]> wrote:

> >>> On 12/19/2014 at 09:46 AM, Mark Pace <[email protected]> wrote:
> > sles003:~> df -Ht
> > df: option requires an argument -- 't'
> > Try 'df --help' for more information.
> > sles003:~> df -H
> > Filesystem               Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> > /dev/mapper/system-root  5.7G  2.5G  3.0G  46% /
> > devtmpfs                 460M  8.2k  460M   1% /dev
> > tmpfs                    467M     0  467M   0% /dev/shm
> > tmpfs                    467M  7.4M  460M   2% /run
> > tmpfs                    467M     0  467M   0% /sys/fs/cgroup
> > /dev/mapper/system-root  5.7G  2.5G  3.0G  46% /.snapshots
> > /dev/mapper/system-root  5.7G  2.5G  3.0G  46% /var/tmp
> > /dev/mapper/system-root  5.7G  2.5G  3.0G  46% /var/spool
> > /dev/dasda1              204M   26M  168M  14% /boot/zipl
> > /dev/mapper/system-root  5.7G  2.5G  3.0G  46% /var/opt
> > /dev/mapper/system-root  5.7G  2.5G  3.0G  46% /var/lib/pgsql
> > /dev/mapper/system-root  5.7G  2.5G  3.0G  46% /var/lib/mailman
> > /dev/mapper/system-root  5.7G  2.5G  3.0G  46% /opt
> -snip-
>
> OK, even though I got the switches wrong (should have been -hT) I can see
> what you've done.  First, I'll reiterate my long-standing "don't put / on
> an LV" recommendation.  Having the ability to boot from a read-only
> snapshot might make that less important, but I don't know that to be true
> yet.
>
> Since btrfs is new to everyone in an enterprise environment, I'm not sure
> what you've done is of any real benefit.  A btrfs file system can span
> multiple physical (or virtual) volumes.  So, you can do a
>
> btrfs device add dev1 dev2 /path/to/filesystem
>
> if extra space is needed.  Having everything in one large btrfs on LVM
> doesn't help with the problem of a runaway process (or user) filling up
> everything, _unless_ you start using quotas.  I suspect most people on this
> mailing list haven't bothered doing that up until now, so this would be one
> more new thing to deal with.
>
> It will be interesting to see what winds up working best for you and
> anyone else trying things out.  Thanks for helping me understand your setup.
>
>
> Mark Post
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
> visit
> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For more information on Linux on System z, visit
> http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
>



-- 
The postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent
Mainline’s positions or opinions

Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/

Reply via email to