Not sure about massive, but fairly large, 16.5M rows. The initial build and index setup took 8.1G diskspace on Linux. I will get a packet trace.
-- Donald J. [email protected] On Wed, Jan 28, 2015, at 05:33 AM, Rob van der Heij wrote: > On 28 January 2015 at 14:20, Donald J. <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can anyone recommend the best hipersocket MTU size for DB/2 Text Search > > from z/OS to z/Linux ? > > Choices are 8k/16k/32k/56k. > > > > In many cases it probably will not matter unless the data volume is really > massive. If it does matter, then you need very specific configuration > information or a representative packet track to study. It's not just > "bigger is better" and we had a case where the large MSS actually was the > reason for very poor throughput. > > Rob > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit > http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For more information on Linux on System z, visit > http://wiki.linuxvm.org/ -- http://www.fastmail.com - Does exactly what it says on the tin ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
