On Tue, 7 Nov 2017, Mark Post wrote: > >>> On 11/7/2017 at 12:36 PM, R P Herrold <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don't understand what you are seeking as a change from Red > > Hat here, Mark > > I'm not seeking any change from Red Hat, just telling the OP > that unless that change happens (and I'm pretty sure it will > not), he's going to have to keep doing this (or whatever > might be preferable) as long as he wants to keep the > "old/traditional" interface names of eth?.
* nod * Okay I was unsure if you felt that there was some approach on your $EMPLOYER's side that RHT was 'missing a bet' in not documenting how to address, and was planning to file with them any RFE, if that were the case Thank you -- Russ herrold ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
