Hi,
Thanks for all the replies. However, what I take away is
> vmcp would need enhancements to ...
Most of the code I write is driven from Linux, so it can issue CP commands
but cannot run CMS commands, thus any REXX EXEC.
Have any of the vmcp developers heard this requirement before?
-Mike M
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 8:15 PM Donald Russell <russell....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Does CPFOR have to be the first stage? I’d like to pass the userid as an
> argument and have it read commands from primary input and write responses
> to primary output, and the return code from each command to secondary
> output if connected.
>
> Similar to the CO and COMMAND stages.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 13:23 Rob van der Heij <rvdh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm not going to try with vmcp, but I can do it with CMS Pipelines. Enjoy
>> (make sure to uppercase the relevant part of the CP command it issue).
>>
>> PIPE (END \) cpfor rvdh Q V 191 | insert ,> , | cons
>> > DASD 0191 3390 M01U01 R/W 250 CYL ON DASD 1206 SUBCHANNEL = 0000
>> Ready; T=0.01/0.01 16:22:19
>> id
>> RVDHEIJ AT RMHVMY VIA * 08/22/20 16:22:24 EDT SATURDAY
>> Ready; T=0.01/0.01 16:22:24
>>
>>
>> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/rvdheij/293d9cb197c138598142d5349afbd112
>> <https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgist.githubusercontent.com%2Frvdheij%2F293d9cb197c138598142d5349afbd112&data=02%7C01%7CIBMVM%40listserv.uark.edu%7Cbc0a4ec0ee5842976a9808d846f9b224%7C79c742c4e61c4fa5be89a3cb566a80d1%7C0%7C0%7C637337385533378503&sdata=884tAZ65npmSCaV6chKsDwWw56zb5AS7cI41Md6TE7U%3D&reserved=0>
>>
>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 at 17:29, Donald Russell <russell....@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I’m saying if the vmcp commend in Linux is to handle the response from
>>> CP FOR, it’s not as simple as “use diag 8 to put the response in a buffer”.
>>> That’s what vmcp does now and then writes the buffer to STDOUT. vmcp would
>>> need enhancements to catch the asynchronous response and write *that*
>>> to STDOUT.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 08:18 John P. Hartmann <jphartm...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 8/22/20 15:46, Donald Russell wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > diag 8 may not do what you want (depends on what you want) when using
>>>> CP
>>>>
>>>> > FOR... the response is asynchronous. When I use CP FOR in an
>>>> exec/pipe I
>>>>
>>>> > have to set up a *ASYNC pipeline if I want the exec to handle the
>>>>
>>>> > response.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So something in CP generates what looks like a MSGNOH response.
>>>>
>>>> Presumably that also means that CP FOR and pipes STARMSG don't
>>>> interoperate?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
--
-Mike MacIsaac
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www2.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
