Elks currently uses the bcc C compiler, which, for ELKS, is limited to 64k of code and 64k of data. Now, can X be made to run in 128K? ;-) Greg [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tuesday, January 19, 1999 1:45 PM, Chipzz [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > OK I know this sounds really strange, but are there any plans to port X to > ELKS? I know it won't run on most machines, but I guess a 286 with 2MB > might be able to handle it. After all, win3.1 runs on it... > Maybe just a subset of it's features, just enough to make it possible to > export apps running on another computer to it. This would make for a GREAT > low-end graphical terminal... > OC, TCP/IP would have to be implemented first... > > Just some silly idea... > > Chipzz AKA > Jan Van Buggenhout > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > UNIX isn't dead - It just smells funny > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >
