> Hi David Murn, > > > Not quite. Not "Linux machines based on the 8086" more "Linux based on > > the 8086". > > > If you can't distinguish the difference between 8086 and 80x86 maybe you > > should read up on it some more. > > > We don't mind 8086 linux questions, that's 100% what the list is for, but > > 8086, NOT x86 (as the list implies). > > Not that I'm arguing, I agree that the original question was posted > to the wrong list. But what questions about development for the > 80286 (such as 286 protected mode)? I've noticed a few discussions > involving that, which I guess then was totally off-topic. *HUGE SIGH* People really ought to reboot themselves with the pedantic option turned off.
- Re: Kernel 2.2.0 too big on RH5.2 system... David Schleef
- Re: Kernel 2.2.0 too big on RH5.2 system... David D.W. Downey
- Re: Kernel 2.2.0 too big on RH5.2 system... Jonathan Hall
- Re: Kernel 2.2.0 too big on RH5.2 system... David Murn
- Re: Kernel 2.2.0 too big on RH5.2 system... Jakob Eriksson
- Re: Kernel 2.2.0 too big on RH5.2 syste... Chipzz
- linux-8086 info line David Schleef
- Re: Kernel 2.2.0 too big on RH5.2 syste... Jonathan Hall
- Re: Kernel 2.2.0 too big on RH5.2 system... Stephen Bowyer
- Re: Kernel 2.2.0 too big on RH5.2 syste... David Murn
- Re: Kernel 2.2.0 too big on RH5.2 syste... Simon Weijgers
- Re: Kernel 2.2.0 too big on RH5.2 system... Beau Kuiper
- Re: Kernel 2.2.0 too big on RH5.2 system... Alistair Riddoch
