On Sat, 30 Jan 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
> It would be much easier if you hosted them. www.uk.linux.org is secure
> shell access from named machines and behind firewalls 8)
Bah, CVS is secure enough.
Does anyone else find this amusing.. a secure shell system, with firewalls
and stuff, running an http server which will give the info you send to it
publicly.
I do like the idea of having the web stuff on whichever site it goes to
being CVS accessable. So for example if there's a page about dev86, Rob
can look after it, if there's a page about networking, the networking
author can maintain it, and so on, rather than having to pass the info to
one person for updates.
Davey
