On Sunday, July 18, 1999 6:01 AM, Alan Cox [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
: > Why has elks chosen a 16 bit inode number for stat when the rest of the world
: > has 32 bit inode numbers? It probably is a good idea to use 32bit inode numbers.
:
: Small computers, small problems.
:
Alan's response is an accurate overall encapsulation of the problem.
A bit of history: elks is based on linux ext2 is based on linux minix is based on
minix,
whose executable file format was copied which used 16 bit inode numbers... (remember
stat?)
- Re: rfs (new filesystem for ELKS) Beau Kuiper
- RE: rfs (new filesystem for ELKS) Greg Haerr
- RE: rfs (new filesystem for ELKS) Beau Kuiper
- tiny sash typo Scott Lanning
- Re: tiny sash typo Alistair Riddoch
- RE: rfs (new filesystem for ELKS) Greg Haerr
- RE: rfs (new filesystem for ELKS) Beau Kuiper
- Re: rfs (new filesystem for ELKS) Alan Cox
- Re: rfs (new filesystem for ELKS) Beau Kuiper
- RE: rfs (new filesystem for ELKS) Greg Haerr
- RE: rfs (new filesystem for ELKS) David Murn
- RE: rfs (new filesystem for ELKS) Greg Haerr
- RE: rfs (new filesystem for ELKS) Beau Kuiper
