On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Bill Ewing wrote:
> DRAM chips were 64K at the time, moving to 256K.
> The thought that you wouldn't be able to build in less than 256K
> seemed absolutely sinful. A 16-bit path would have wound up with a
> whopping 512K RAM on ENTRY!
Actually the first IBM PC mobos had 16K chips... they got 64K
later on. Still, they cheapened other things quite a bit too - they
introduced a wait state (even though the 8088 built in 3-4 :) ) etc.
- Chad
>
> --Bill
- Re Z80<->8088, was: Linux on TI? Henrik Sorensen
- Re: Re Z80<->8088, was: Linux on TI? Markus Leypold
- Re: Re Z80<->8088, was: Linux on TI? Louis P. Santillan
- Re: Re Z80<->8088, was: Linux on TI? Ken Yap
- RE: Re Z80<->8088, was: Linux on TI? Hessel Schut
- RE: Re Z80<->8088, was: Linux on TI? Alex Holden
- RE: Re Z80<->8088, was: Linux on TI? Jakob Eriksson
- Re: Re Z80<->8088, was: Linux on... Bill Ewing
- RE: Re Z80<->8088, was: Lin... Chad Page
- RE: Re Z80<->8088, was: Linux on TI? stevenwilson
