: > We'd have to seperate the code which requires David's public domain
: > license into seperate files to the code which is under MPL though.
:
: That is good practice. David wanted his original code to be totally
: free. Lets make it easy for people to use it that way
Alan, I thought you said that nano-X/microwindows was a derivative work,
and thus another license can be put upon it. David's code has no restrictions
on derivative works, as long as his copyright remains intact. Alex, your and my
revisions are completely new work. We are debating a [L][GM]PL license
for the derivative work.
So - we don't _have_ to separate any code. David's original
code is available on Alex's and my ftp server. Correct?
- Re: Request for comments - Mi... Alex Holden
- RE: Request for comments - Microwindows Gregory Leblanc
- RE: Request for comments - Microwindows Louis P. Santillan
- RE: Request for comments - Microwindows Alex Holden
- RE: Request for comments - Microwindows Louis P. Santillan
- RE: Request for comments - Microwindow... Alex Holden
- RE: Request for comments - Microw... Scott Lanning
- RE: Request for comments - Mi... Louis P. Santillan
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Vidar Hokstad
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Bradley D. LaRonde
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Greg Haerr
- RE: Request for comments - Microwindows Greg Haerr
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Vidar Hokstad
