On Sat, 5 Feb 2000, Greg Haerr wrote: > Yes. I'm quite familiar with MSDOS EXE format and the current > code doesn't do anything near what's required. And even if it did, > there's the problem of having linking with a Linux8086 libc but producing > .exe files... I know. I guess someone obviously missed the word 'joke' distributed throughout my email. Now I know how k&r felt when people took C seriously. Davey
- Re: Dos Binary Compatibility WAS Re: elksfs status semjaza
- Re: Dos Binary Compatibility WAS Re: elksfs status David Murn
- Re: Dos Binary Compatibility WAS Re: elksfs status Greg Haerr
- David Murn
