Yes.
I have started sending them to <www.spamcop.net> maybe someone at the
Topica.com will awaken and turn off their stupid script.
John O
Rod Boyce wrote:
>
> Does anybody else get these messages when trying to reply to the Linux-8086
> list?
>
> I most defiantly have not subscribed to whatever this is.
>
> Regards,
> Rod Boyce.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Natasha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, 12 June 2000 08:46
> To: Rod Boyce
> Subject: Your recent message to Topica.com
>
> You recently sent a message,
>
> RE: Building ELKS
>
> to Linux-Lizard. This is a restricted list, which means that only
>
> subscribers of the list can post to it. Our records indicate that you
>
> are not a member of the list.
>
> If you would like more information about this list, or you would like to
>
> join the list, you can go to the Topica web site ( http://www.topica.com)
> <http://www.topica.com)>
>
> and search for the list.
>
> Topica's site also has thousands of lists you can join. See
>
> for yourself at: http://www.topica.com <http://www.topica.com> You can
> check out our
>
> collection of great TipWorld tips at:
>
> http://www.topica.com/tipworld?system1
> <http://www.topica.com/tipworld?system1>
>
> Questions about the service? Check out Topica's Help
>
> section at http://www.topica.com <http://www.topica.com> -- just click on
> "help"
>
> at the bottom of the screen.
>
> Still have questions? Email Topica at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Please include the email address of the list you're
>
> inquiring about, and the email address you use to
>
> subscribe to the list.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Topica Customer Support
>
> -------------------------------
>
> +++++ Original Message ++++++++
>
> -------------------------------
>
> Return-Path:
>
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Received: (qmail 13786 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2000 20:46:08 -0000
>
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Received: (qmail 13781 invoked by uid 0); 11 Jun 2000 20:46:07 -0000
>
> Received: from nic.funet.fi (193.166.0.145)
>
> by inmta007.topica.com with SMTP; 11 Jun 2000 20:46:07 -0000
>
> Received: from vger.rutgers.edu ([128.6.190.2]:15145 "EHLO vger.rutgers.edu"
>
> ident: "NO-IDENT-SERVICE[2]" smtp-auth: TLS-CIPHER: )
>
> by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id ;
>
> Sun, 11 Jun 2000 23:44:30 +0300
>
> Received: by vger.rutgers.edu via listexpand id ;
>
> Sun, 11 Jun 2000 16:43:02 -0400
>
> Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id ;
>
> Sun, 11 Jun 2000 16:42:19 -0400
>
> Received: from smtp.dmcwave.co.nz ([202.27.34.6]:1601 "EHLO
> smtp.dmcwave.co.nz")
>
> by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id ;
>
> Sun, 11 Jun 2000 16:38:21 -0400
>
> Received: by EXCHWENZ01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
>
> id ; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 08:38:04 +1200
>
> Message-ID: <9DCCE20055ACD311BBE200104B08D834742D23@EXCHWENZ01>
>
> From: Rod Boyce
>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Subject: RE: Building ELKS
>
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 08:37:12 +1200
>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
>
> X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
>
> Content-Type: text/plain;
>
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Precedence: bulk
>
> X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> What about the low end embedded applications. Say for instance a small PDA
>
> type device. Or my own application I have a mobile robotic platform with a
>
> tight power budget and I have found an NEC V25 SBC to operate it (this board
>
> draws 100mA). The OS I will have a look at is going to be ELKS for its
>
> small size and ability to run on an XT. I challenge you to find me a 486 or
>
> 68000 SBC to match or better it...
>
> While this project may only be for my benefit and is not a commercial
>
> product I certainly expect it to further my career.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rod Boyce
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Blaz Antonic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Sent: Sunday, 11 June 2000 04:31
>
> To: David Lloyd-Jones
>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Subject: Re: Building ELKS
>
> > > Does anybody have any success stories to share off of
>
> this list regarding
>
> > > the installation process of ELKS, and on what specie of
>
> computer they did
>
> > it on?
>
> >
>
> > No. Nobody.
>
> That's not very funny. Of course the whole thing works ..
>
> it's just that
>
> i am unable to see much (any ?) use for it nowadays; it made
>
> some sense
>
> 5 years ago but doesn't make any now. It is good source to
>
> learn OS
>
> basics from though.
>
> bye, Ab
