Greg Haerr a �crit:
> the older versions are faster
> : > than the newer. The starting is the same but the shell is slower.
> : Mods to tty stuff shouldn't give any sort of noticeable difference, or fs
> : stuff. There is mention of changes to timer code, but I don't see why any
> : stuff like that should make any noticable difference.
>
> What do you mean, "the shell is slower"? You mean the tty output
> is slower? The prompt is displayed after some delay when no
> input is typed? Or applications are read from disk and are slower
> to start?
I think that it's the tty which is slow :
For example, I've used fdisk. When I hit '?' to display the help menu, the
display is slow : 3 lines, next 1 second, 2 lines, 1/2 second...
Secondly, when I use ls or cd, the floppy disk light is switched off (I
think, because of the cache buffer) and the output appears slowly.
Re: ELKS 0.0.81 slower than the 0.0.76
COIFFIER =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric Tue, 18 Jul 2000 14:41:43 -0700
- ELKS 0.0.81 slower than the 0.0.76 COIFFIER =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric
- Re: ELKS 0.0.81 slower than the ... Luke Farrar
- Re: ELKS 0.0.81 slower than ... Greg Haerr
- Re: ELKS 0.0.81 slower t... Luke Farrar
- COIFFIER =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric
