> Unfortunately, I think it's probably unlikely that any of the kernel
> heavy-weights are going to bother to debug anything on the BP6 which
> obviously is not the most stable board in the world.
interesting thought. my conversations with alan show differently.
of course, you first must be pretty certain the hardware works ok and
when my previous board was swapped (due to a hardware failure) I again
have a very stable system. sometimes, people must have a few things
changed.
for instance. my powersupply I use can't power up the viper 550 with 256
MB memory because the total amount of power for both 5v+3.3v exceeds the
maximum power the supply can make.
does that make the board a failure ? no, the guys who made the system
failed here.
bottom line -- my board failed due to two things. supply underrated and
the board itself failed. the latter always can happen.
--
=- To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the -=
=- body of "unsubscribe linux-abit". -=
