> On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 10:00:34AM +0100, thus said Zdenek Kabelac:
>
> > test11 is hardly broken - DO NOT USE THIS KERNEL
> > try test12pre3 which fixies some problem - though not all.
>
> Umm, what is broken in it? I have been running it 2 days without a
> problem. Getting much less APIC errors than before, for the record. Should I
> be scared of something evil like (eek) file corruption? What has changed in
> test12?
Please read linux kernel mailing list - several main kernel developers are
reporting file corruption with test11 - with test12pre3 there
are several fixies for this problem.
This is what happend to me:
$ tar zxf linux-2.4.0-test11.tar.gz
gzip: stdin: invalid compressed data--format violated
tar: Unexpected EOF in archive
tar: Child returned status 1
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
After reboot this file was correct again...
I would say no other comments are neccessary. Though there are still
problems with test12pre3 they are definitely smaller then with test11
--
There are three types of people in the world:
those who can count, and those who can't.
Zdenek Kabelac http://i.am/kabi/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] {debian.org; fi.muni.cz}
--
=- To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the -=
=- body of "unsubscribe linux-abit". -=
