>>>2) acpi-cpufreq does not load either, returns ENODEV too. >>>It's probably git-acpi. I tried to revert it but there are >>>lots of other patches depending on it, so I finally gave up. >>> >>> >> >>Brice, >>Can you try the converse? >>Apply the acpi patch (which is included in -mm) >>without the rest of the mm tree to see if that broke acpi-cpufreq?: >> >>http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/patche >s/test/2.6.15/acpi-test-20051216-2.6.15.diff.bz2 >> >>thanks, >>-Len >> >> > >Len, > >This patch applied on top of 2.6.15 breaks acpi-cpufreq in the >same way.
Ah good! Can you test the _PDC patch here all by itself? http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5483#c17 If this patch is what causes the failure, please build with CONFIG_ACP_DEBUG=y and attach the dmesg from the failure, as well as the output from acpidump, available in the latest pmtools here: http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/utils thanks, -Len - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
