Hi Len, On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 02:05:23PM -0500, Brown, Len wrote: > Also, you may find that the current speedstep-centrino > is able to load on this system. Without hard-coded tables > for this processor family/model/stepping, it too would use > the ACPI PSS, but it would use native MSR access, which > is lower overhead than the IO port access used by acpi-cpufreq. > (in the future, acpi-cpufreq and speedstep-centrino should > be combined into a single driver)
Do you mean you want to combine all possible drivers into only one? That is at that time of writing: acpi-cpufreq (IO version), speedstep-centrino, powernow-k7 and powernow-k8? Well, it might be possible that some cpufreq devellopers would be against this approach I'm afraid. -- Bruno Ducrot -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
